Ezekiel 1: Light in the Darkness

Ezekiel 1 is one of those chapters you pretend to like because when you were a kid you learned that all Scripture is breathed out by God, but in your heart of hearts it lies in a theological wastebasket along with pretty much all the Old Testament (minus Psalms, Proverbs, and- because it’s about sex- the Song of Solomon).  Yet it is here that we must begin.

If you’ve never heard the term “theophany” before, now is a good time to learn it.  A theophany is simply a manifestation of God.  While it’s assumed in Scripture that no one can literally see God (John 1:18, 1 Timothy 6:16), there are many incidents in which God does somehow display his glory.  Several examples of God manifesting himself are seen in the book of Exodus, like in the burning bush (3:2), in the storm and smoke which surrounded Mount Sinai (19:16-18), and in the cloud which led the Israelites by day and the pillar of fire which led them by night (13:21-22).  Throughout Scripture, God was “seen” in storms (for example, Psalm 18:7-15, and the previously mentioned Exodus 19:16-18), and as sitting upon a throne (Psalm 80:1, 99:1; Isaiah 6:1).  In this first chapter, Ezekiel sees both of these images (vv. 4, 26-28): the throne signifying authority, the storm of free movement.  And sandwiched between the two are the things which make this chapter so trippy.  In the storm, Ezekiel sees three things: four living creatures, wheels, and the throne far above them.

The Four Living Creatures (vv.5-14)

The living creatures were cherubim (spoiler alert) according to Ezekiel’s own words in chapter 10.  Cherubim have fallen on hard times in the art world.  We see them as cute little baby angels with the most pinchable wittle cheeks you’ve ever seen.  But searching for a biblical depiction of cherubim would probably lead you to the black light poster section at Spencer Gifts before it would the Thomas Kincaid section at the Christian bookstore four doors down.  Cherubim eat Thomas Kincaid whole.  They were the real deal.  They had power.  Giant statues of them stood outside temples in Mesopotamia as guardians, and they were also depicted as the creatures who held up the sky, where the gods lived.  Solomon even put up two in his temple (1 Kings 6:23-28).

The cherubim Ezekiel saw resembled the depictions he had seen of them in his own time: they had a human form (v.5), several faces and wings (v.6), the feet of a bull (v.7), and the heads of a lion, ox, and eagle in addition to a human head (v.10).  These winged bull-men were common in ancient near eastern cultures, usually in the important role of supporting a deity’s throne or guarding his temple.  ”They were attendants of deity, supporting his majesty and defending his empire.  From his cultural surroundings, Ezekiel would have recognized such creatures as indicating the presence of deity, even if it did not immediately dawn on his terrified mind that it was indeed Yahweh they were attending (not until v.28 is this indentification made).” (Christopher Wright)

As to the details of these creatures, they seem to be formed into a square.  Their wings are raised high and touch the others’ wings.  Their backs are to each other.  The eagle face was at the back of each head facing the inside of the square.  The lion’s head faced right and the ox’s head faced left.  This imagery, while crazy to us, would have been familiar to Ezekiel and his contemporaries.  As Chris Wright observes:”Individually or in combination, these four creatures are to be found in religious art and statuary all across the ancient world, and in Israel too they had symbolic or proverbial significance.”  For example,

-the lion was known for its strength, ferocity, and courage. It was also a symbol of royalty.
-the eagle was the most stately of birds, as well as the fastest.
-the ox was domestically very valuable and served as a symbol of fertility and divinity.
-the human is created in God’s image and thus is the most dignified and noble of all.
(D.I. Block- The Book of Ezekiel, 1-24)

Taken together, these four creatures express the divine attributes of God’s omniscience (he is all-knowing) and his omnipresence (he is all-powerful).  Block concludes, “Yahweh has the strength and majesty of the lion, the swiftness and mobility of the eagle, the procreative power of the bull, and the wisdom and reason of humankind.”

If the creatures themselves are as powerful as the imagery suggests, what must that say about the deity they serve?  In short: that he is in complete control over all the earth, and that he is everywhere (the lightning in verse 14).

The Wheels (vv.15-21)

A quick word on this.  The creatures are said to have moved by “the spirit”, and each one, though in a square formation would constantly be moving forward (v.12).  Their ability to go in any direction without swiveling or turning is explained by the fact that each creature had a wheel that interlocked with another wheel.  Though they had wings, the wheels within wheels, moved by the spirit (v.20), were their primary source of movement.  Don’t get hung up on this part trying to figure out the engineering of it all.  This has baffled readers for thousands of years, and I’m not about to help it make sense in your mind.  The main point of the wheels is that they enabled the creatures to move in any direction without turning.

The Throne (vv.22-28)

Ezekiel’s vision now leaves the living creatures and looks far above them where he saw “an expanse, shining like awe-inspiring crystal, spread out above their heads.” (v.22)  As it was a crystal (and thus transparent) expanse, he was able to see through it to what lay beyond, which was “the likeness of a throne, in appearance like sapphire; and seated above the likeness of a throne was a likeness with a human appearance.” (v.26)  The Hebrew word Ezekiel uses for the human likeness of this enthroned being is the same word used in Genesis 1:26 when God is said to have created man in his likeness.  And this seems to be the point at which Ezekiel realizes who he’s looking at: the God who made man in his likeness, manifesting himself in the likeness of man.  ”Such was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell on my face, and I heard the voice of one speaking.” (v.28)

What Does This Mean?

I think one of most significant words in this chapter is the word “there.”  It’s found in verse 3, at the end of the prologue to Ezekiel’s vision.  It’s written that the hand of the LORD was upon Ezekiel there.  Where?  In Babylon.  In the land where God seemed absent.  In the land of the peoples whose gods appeared to have devastated Israel’s God, with the captivity of his people to show for it.  Yet there he was in Babylon, very much alive, and very much still in charge.  He is still sovereign over all things (the throne), and he is present at all times and in all places (the wheels/the spirit).  In light of this vision, the idea that God can ever been defeated or thwarted in his plans is a joke.

Many of the Israelites in exile felt abandoned and hopeless, for in their mind God was defeated and distant, and their captors felt bigger than him.  We’re not so different from them.  Through sufferings, addictions, and other trials, it’s easy to forget that God is bigger than our problems and that he has the power to free us from them.  Sometimes it’s hard to remember that he cares about us, because he seems to be so far away.  Ezekiel 1 reminds us that in the darkest pits of despair, God is still sovereign and near.  In Paul’s words, we all once had “no hope and [were] without God in the world.” (Ephesians 2:12)  The difference-maker that reversed that condition though was that God sent his Son to shine as a light in a dark world, to destroy the works of the devil, and to set free those who had been captive to him. (John 1:4, 1 John 3:8, 2 Timothy 2:26)

To be a part of God’s people means that he will never abandon you. (Matthew 28:20, Hebrews 13:5)  It’s to remember that whatever darkness you face, you never face it alone.   (Psalm 139:7-12, Psalm 23:4, Acts 7:55-56)  It’s to remember that his purposes for you are only good, even though they may be difficult. (Romans 8:28, Hebrews 12:7)  It’s to be comforted by the awareness that any feelings you ever have about God not being with you are lies.

The comforting aspect of this passage is only one aspect though, and I’ve definitely treated it from a long-range perspective.  It is comforting that God is sovereign and loving and that he does not give up on his people.  But in Ezekiel’s context, while God may have been gloriously active and present, he first had some harsh words of judgment for the exiles. (See “The Ministry of Ezekiel the Prophet“)  Yet even so, that God did not just abandon the Israelites forever is a remarkable show of grace.  He may have come with a harsh message, but he has come nonetheless.  God’s love pursues.  And it rebukes when necessary.

So there we are.  One chapter down. Forty-seven to go.

(Gulp.)

3 Comments

The Single Man Gets Married: Two Reflections on My Single Life

[Here's a couple of reflections I jotted down earlier in the week about singleness.  Figured I'd get this out there before I leave on my honeymoon tomorrow!]

As of this Saturday I’m going to be a married man, and a big part of me still can’t believe I get to say that.  Many people have gone through long periods of singleness in their lives, but I’ve so often felt like the singlest of singles.  Seriously: I went through all my college life without going on a single date, and then a couple more years after college.  I had almost an entire decade between dates.  The first one I went on in my twenties was right before I turned 27.  Adding salt to the wound is the fact that I’m a hopeless romantic.  I’m the guy who likes to buy flowers, write notes, open the car door, etc.  So my many, many dateless Friday nights belonged not to a single who felt he wanted to serve the Lord as a single man for the rest of his life.  No, I often spent those evenings with a heart that was aching to be with someone.

Though girlfriends in my life have been few and far between, I’d always held out an intense optimism that I’d meet my soul mate one day.  I’ve been convinced so many times that I’d found “the One”, only to end up heartbroken and frustrated.  Typically my love went unrequited.  Still I held out hope that “the One” was still to come (or that the one who broke my heart would realize her mistake). But when I hit my mid-twenties and had no prospects at all, I began to be doubtful for the first time in my life that I’d ever marry.  I felt in my heart that God had built me for marriage, but I struggled to recognize that with the fact that girls just didn’t seem to notice me in the way I wanted to be noticed.

Singleness had long felt like an unwanted part of my identity.  I was sick of hearing sermons on dating.  I was sick of hearing preachers talk about finding a wife as if it was as easy as going to pick up something from the store.  I was very cynical when preachers (married preachers) would encourage singles to live up their singleness and embrace it as a gift from God.  ”Good advice,” I thought, “from the guy who’s going to go home and sleep next to the woman he loves tonight.”  It felt like a beggar-turned-millionaire telling beggars how awesome the beggar life is and then flying off in his private jet.

So it’s with utter humility and weirdness that I get to be that guy now.  There’s probably a million reflections concerning singleness I could come up with given enough time, but for now here’s two…

Reflection #1: Circumstances Don’t Change Idols.

It took me a long time to realize it, but my desire for a wife had straight up become an idol.  There was a long period of time that I felt like life wasn’t worth getting excited about if I was going to do it as a single guy.  By way of reminder, wanting a spouse is a good desire.  What’s bad is when it becomes a need.

All I wanted when I was single was someone to love and hold.  And it hurt to not have it.  So when Krystal came into my life, that want went away, right?  Not even close.  On the surface it looked like I just wanted to be married.  But deep in my heart I was suffering from approval idolatry.  I needed the affirmation and acceptance that I believed a wife would offer.  When I didn’t get that, I lamented that I was unloveable and that no woman would ever want to marry me.  Yet when I got a woman who loves me and wanted to marry me, that didn’t solve the problem.  See, I still crave that affirmation like crazy.  The context just looks different.  In singleness, that unmet need for affirmation resulted in an inner voice telling me that I’d die alone.  In dating and engagement, whenever I upset Krystal or hurt her in any way, that inner voice tells me that she’s disappointed in me and is having second thoughts about whether or not she wants to be with me.  And when I upset her in marriage, I imagine that voice will tell me that she’s wondering if she feels like she made a mistake in marrying me.  ”Yeah she said she wanted to be with me forever, but she didn’t have all the info on me.  She didn’t know how rotten I was, and now she’s having buyer’s remorse.”

I wish I’d known earlier that having a woman in my life doesn’t magically cure my loneliness.  In one sense I did know it.  I’d heard it a million times before from preachers that a spouse ultimately couldn’t satisfy, only Jesus could.   But deep down I always assumed the people saying that could only say it because they didn’t desire to be married as much as I did.  They didn’t know how deeply my desire ran, I thought.  But now I realize that I am fighting the same battle in my heart when I fail Krystal as I did on all those lonely Friday nights as a single with no prospects.

Reflection #2: Know What God Has Promised You.

This is a big one.  You may have a strong prompting from the Holy Spirit that you’re supposed to be married.  You may even have a strong prompting of the person you’re supposed to be married to.  But it’s one thing to feel led by the Spirit and another to trust in a promise from God.  When all is said and done, God has not promised you a spouse.  When I first confessed that out loud it was pretty hard to accept.  But as I repeated it over and over it became a great comfort to me.

We’re all like the Israelites in the wilderness after Egypt.  They didn’t trust God to provide for them.  So they complained.  More specifically, they grumbled because they didn’t trust that God was good.  My grumbling in singleness was a grumbling against God’s goodness.  It was a declaration that “I am single, and I shouldn’t be.  God hasn’t given me what he should.”  To add sin to sin, I’d mask my frustration by trying to make it look religious.  I wasn’t “grumbling”, I just “had a deep desire from God to be married.”

I wish I’d seen that there is a distinction between being burdened and grumbling.  For example it’s one thing for a believer to have a burden to go minister to a certain people group overseas or go plant a church in a certain city.  It’s another thing to want to go do those things because you’re grumbling about how materialistic and uncool your ministry opportunities are in your current locale.  (Dallas hipster reformed Christians like me struggle with this a lot, ‘cuz I mean…Dallas.)  I believe God has always put a desire for marriage into my heart.  I believe he built me for it.  But I wish I had owned that and then just trusted him to do something about it rather than feel like I should help him out because his timing wasn’t good. (Should’ve studied the life of Abraham more closely.)

Before Krystal and I started dating, God began to flood me with comfort when I began to simply accept that he wasn’t out to screw me over.  It did wonders for me to simply focus on what he had promised me.  For instance, he had promised to be good to me. (Romans 8:28)  God is in the process of spiraling everything in your life toward your good and his glory, and if that doesn’t comfort you, the problem isn’t in the truth but in your definition of “good.”  I started trusting his promise rather than my feelings, and the result was comfort.  Additionally (and especially with regard to singleness), I banked on his promise in Psalm 84:11- “For the LORD is a sun and shield; the LORD bestows favor and honor.  No good thing does he withhold from those who walk uprightly.”  God’s not a withholding God.  He wasn’t holding out on me in the blessings department because I was single.  I realized that I was no less blessed than my married friends.  He doesn’t always bless in the same way, but he’s in the business of lavishing blessing upon every single one of his children.  This is a very clear Biblical truth (see Ephesians 1:3 and 2 Peter 1:3-4) that I could either choose to trust or not.

1 Comment

Introduction to Ezekiel: The Ministry of Ezekiel the Prophet

My next entry in this whole Ezekiel series will be cover the first chapter of the book.  But before we get there, I wanted to note a few things about Ezekiel’s ministry, particularly the climate he was called to minister in and the roles God called him to take on as a prophet.

The Climate of His Ministry

I’ve already covered some of this a couple entries back, but it’s worth revisiting.  Ezekiel had been carried off to Babylon in 597 BC as part of the first deportation (second if you count the smaller deportation in 605 which included the prophet Daniel).  There was another deportation in 587 when Babylon finally crushed the southern kingdom of Judah and destroyed the temple of the Lord.  The first part of Ezekiel’s ministry was from about 593-587 and was directed to the exiles who had been taken in 597.  These people had naturally suffered much trauma.  They had been relocated far away from their homes and from loved ones who had been left behind.  Yet amidst such harsh realities, there was still a glimmer of hope in some.  No matter how bad things were for them, Jerusalem could never fully be destroyed.  Or so they thought.  When the city was destroyed with many more exiles to show for it, that glimmer of hope was shattered.

The fall of Jerusalem resulted in spiritual and psychological trauma for the exiles.  They simply couldn’t believe it.  The temple and city of their God had been destroyed.  Were the Babylonian gods more powerful than the God of Israel?  Had he been shamed as they had by a superior force?  Was there any future left for them as a people?  Where was God?  Does he even have the ability to rescue them from the apparently superior Babylonian deities?  How should they make sense of this catastrophe?  ”Ezekiel, then, was called to serve God in the midst of a shattered and shell-shocked people, a context not far removed from many contexts of mission today.” (Christopher Wright)  Psalm 137 remembers Jewish life in exile:

By the water of Babylon, there we sat down and wept, when we remembered Zion.
On the willows there we hung up our lyres.
For there our captors required of us songs, and our tormentors, mirth, saying “Sing us one of the songs of Zion!”
How shall we sing the LORD’s song in a foreign land?
If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill!
Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth, if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy!
Remember, O LORD, against the Edomites the day of Jerusalem, how they said, “Lay it bare, lay it bare, down to its foundations!”
O daughter of Babylon, doomed to be destroyed, blessed shall he be who repays you with what you have done to us!
Blessed shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rock! 

Ezekiel’s call was to preach to people who felt abandoned by their God.

The Roles of His Ministry

Ezekiel was called to be a pastor to his people.  The trauma of exile and of Jerusalem’s fall took many forms for the displaced people of God.  Some rejected their faith outright.  Others maintained baseless optimism.  There were those who protested that God’s judgment was unfair.  And some sank into despair.  As pastor, Ezekiel labored to bring his people to a right understanding of their situation.  They needed to understand that they were going to be in exile for a while, that their judgment was just, yet also that God’s judgment would one day end.  A restoration would come.  ”The emphasis on newness is overwhelming: a new shepherd, new hearts, a new spirit, new breath, new unity.  Ultimately only the language of resurrection (37:1-14) can really do justice to the river of hope being poured out over the languishing dead bones of the exiles.” (Christopher Wright)

Ezekiel was also called to be an evangelist.  As a watchmen meant to warn the people, his warnings were to prompt them into repentant action.  Aspects of this included:

-Conviction of sin.  Ezekiel was ministering a very entitled people who felt proud of their heritage and who felt that they had “an absolute and eternal right to the privileges of land, city and temple.” (Wright)  Some of the people adamantly refused to acknowledge that they were sinners and thus had brought judgment upon themselves.  Because of this, Ezekiel gives perhaps the most graphic depictions of sin found in Scripture (chapters 16, 20, 23) in order to shock them out of their false innocence.

-Apologetics.  Particularly, Ezekiel engaged in what’s called theodicy, or the field of apologetics that addresses the seemingly unjust actions of God. (A classic example of theodicy is answering why a good God would allow evil in the world.)  Many of the exiles were grumbling and complaining that God was not fair to inflict such judgment upon them.  Ezekiel needed to correct these false assumptions.

-Divine Grace.  Ezekiel complements his horrific depictions of sin with some absolutely beautiful depictions of grace.  Israel had continually sought to be like the nations around them (20:32), but God would have none of it.  Through his judgment, he would redeem them.  For his own sake he be merciful to his people.  Christopher Wright beautifully sums this up: “Yahweh will gather and cleanse his people, do some radical heart surgery, and grant his own Spirit to enable full obedience.  The great gospel language of the New Testament is hardly more inspiring, and indeed owes some of its most precious imagery to Ezekiel’s eloquence.”

-Appeal for Repentance.  When conviction of sin has settled in the heart, the next step is to repent.  Ezekiel reminds the exiles that repentance will result in salvation. (18:21-23)  Confessed sins are sins that will not be remembered.

-Assurance of Life.  God’s grace is freely and abundantly offered for all who turn to him and repent.  For those who did, God promised to bring them back to life. (37:12-14)

The darkness was great for the exiles, but the God who spoke brought light into the darkness at creation wouldn’t let the story end there for the people he loved.  This kind of darkness needs a greater light than stars can give, and he was prepared to give it.  When God speaks, darkness scatters.  That brings us to the first chapter of Ezekiel’s prophecy.

1 Comment

Abiding: The Joy of Knowing You’re Loved

The Command

“‘As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you.  Abide in my love.’”
-John 15:9

The “How”

“‘If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commandments and abide in his love.’”
-v.10

The Result

“‘These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full.’”
-v.11

This is an incredible statement.  We are to live in the love Jesus has for us, which is patterned after the Father’s love for Jesus.  People shine when they know they’re loved.  And we will shine when we live in that crazy, unfathomable love that Jesus has for us because our joy will be full (see also Psalm 16:11).  We will experience the joy of that love only by obeying Jesus’ commandments.  Obedient Christians are joyful Christians.

“…obedience is the key to abiding…The relationship between the Father and the Son is again the paradigm for the relationship between the Son and the believer.  The ideas is not that we can withdraw from the circle of God’s love by being disobedient.  God does not stop loving his disobedient children (cf. Luke 15:11-24).  It is rather that we can withdraw from the enjoyment and blessings of His love.  John stressed Jesus’ obedience to His Father in this Gospel…Now Jesus called His disciples to follow His example.”
-Tom Constable

Leave a Comment

Introduction to Ezekiel: A Little Bit About Ezekiel

When we think of Ezekiel we tend to think of a prophet. Rightly so.  After all, he is included in the prophetic section of the Old Testament.  But in Ezekiel 1:3 we learn that before he was called by God to be a prophet, he was a priest-in-training.  Up to this point, his life would have been one of rigorous training, including matters of animal sacrifice as well as teaching and administering the Torah.   His writings also display a broad knowledge of international affairs, politics, and ancient near-eastern mythology.

As a priest, Ezekiel’s role was to represent God to the people, and the people to God.  God stood at the center of his existence and utterly defined his life.  Thus, the glory of God is a huge theme in his ministry, and this God-centeredness colored the way he saw everything around him.  For example, some of the most graphic language used to describe sin in the Bible is found in this book.  As a priest who was deeply concerned with seeing things through God’s eyes, Ezekiel boldly proclaimed the filthiness and disgust of sin, especially idolatry.

In addition to seeing sin through God’s eyes, Ezekiel saw salvation from the same perspective.  What is it that motivates God to save sinful human beings?  Two common (and biblically supported) responses are that of “human need” and “divine emotion.”  A classic example of this is the exodus when God saw the suffering of his people in Egypt and intervened (Exodus 3:7-8).  But for Ezekiel, the ultimate motive for God to save sinful human beings is the desire for his own glory. God will glorify himself, and he will do so through the salvation of his people who are in exile.

As someone who was in training to be a priest, God’s call for Ezekiel to be a prophet was a radical career change.  It was, in Christopher Wright’s words, “disorienting” and was a major theological and professional shift for him.  As a priest, his theological worldview saw everything through the lens of Zion’s temple.  After all, Jerusalem was God’s city, where he had chosen to dwell.  And as a priest, his profession was to serve in that temple.  He would offer sacrifices and represent the people before God.  The problem with a guy like this being called to be a prophet was…well, priests and prophets weren’t exactly getting invited to each others’ parties.  Whereas the priests were to take care of all the sacrifices, the prophets were the guys who had the God-given audacity to call out corrupt priestly practices.  Or to say it another way, God’s true prophets were the guys always standing over the corrupt priests’ shoulders saying “You’re doing it wrong.”  Annoying?  You bet.  Jeremiah does this is Jeremiah 2:8 (though to be fair he also called out false prophets there).  In Jeremiah 20:1-9 we see the tension between prophets and priests when Pashur the priest had Jeremiah beaten and put in stocks.  And in 26:20-23, we read of Uriah the prophet who spoke “in words like those of Jeremiah” and was killed by King Johoiakim.

In light of the schism between prophets and priests, it’s worth appreciating Ezekiel’s sudden career change from a priest to the “lonely, friendless, unpopular role of being a prophet, the mouthpiece of Yahweh.” (Wright)  He’d been preparing his whole life for priesthood and in his thirtieth year, the year that he would have been eligible to begin his priestly duties (Numbers 4:3), not only was Ezekiel far from the temple in Jerusalem, but God called him to a different task, proving that in God’s economy it’s never too late for a career change.  God would certainly use all that he had prepared him for in his priestly training, but he would use it in a far different way than Ezekiel could have anticipated.

Oh, and he had a wife who died ten years into the exile.  (Ezekiel 24:18)  That’s all.

2 Comments

Pride and Haughtiness

“…my eyes are not raised too high…”
-Psalm 131:1

“It…goes with the territory that we are opinionated, routinely judging and belittling others: haughty eyes.  Pride is not just about ME.  It’s also about you.  I must look down on you in some way.  Our absorption in judgmental opinions runs very deep.  Pride says, ‘I’m right in myself.’  Haughty eyes say, ‘I’m right compared to you.’  Have you noticed that even people who feel lousy about themselves are judgmental toward others?  When you feel inferior to others, you don’t respect them or treat them with mercy.  Instead, you envy, hate, grumble, and criticize.  Even self-belittling tendencies- ‘low self-esteem,’ self-pity, self-hatred, timidity, fears of failure and rejection- fundamentally express pride failing, pride intimidated, and pride despairing.  Such pride, even when much battered, still finds someone else to look down on.

A friend of mine once vividly described this problem.  She said that she had almost no true peers, people with whom she related eye-to-eye.  Her relationships were not characterized by generosity, candor, or trust.  There were a few ‘pedestal people’ in her life, people she thought could do no wrong.  There were many, many ‘pit people’ in her life, people she looked down on for one reason or another.  The two categories were connected only by an elevator shaft!  A person could fall off the pedestal and end up in the pit.  She had a long history of disappointment in every relationship.  Unsurprisingly, she was a woman with a lot of inner noise: fretful, self-absorbed, easily offended, depressed, competitive.  But as she grew in Christ, she grew in composure.  As she learned to live in the way of peace, lo and behold, she began to discover peers and to build friendships.”

-David Powlison

Leave a Comment

Introduction to Ezekiel: The Structure and Scope of the Book

Structure

For all its weirdness, the Book of Ezekiel has a mercifully easy structure to follow.  There’s basically two to three-ish categories to divide up the 48 chapters into: before Jerusalem’s fall, after it, and a few chapters during it.  Chapters 1-24 chronicle the first five years of Ezekiel’s ministry, from his calling in 593-592 to the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem in 587.  There’s an interlude section of the book (chapters 25-32) which are directed against the nations at large, and this was delivered mostly during the Jerusalem siege, though some of it came after.  The remaining chapters (33-48) cover the last fifteen years of Ezzy’s ministry.  Here’s two very basic structures of the book-

Super Easy Outline:

1. Ezekiel 1-24       Oracles of judgment before Jerusalem’s fall in 587
2. Ezekiel 25-32     Oracles against the foreign nations
3. Ezekiel 33-48     Oracles of hope after Jerusalem’s fall (587 – 571)

(Adapted from Christopher Wright, The Message of Ezekiel)

Slightly Less Easy Outline:

1. Ezekiel 1-3         Ezekiel’s call/ The first vision
2. Ezekiel 4-24      Judgment on Jerusalem and Judah
3. Ezekiel 25-32   Oracles against the foreign nations
4. Ezekiel 33-39   After the fall of Jerusalem
5. Ezekiel 40-48   Vision of restoration

(Adapted from the ESV Study Bible)

Easy enough, right?

Scope

A brief word here about the reaches of this book.  Ezekiel’s ministry was to a small community of his fellow exiles in Mesopotamia, but theologically speaking, his message was vast in that was aimed toward all nations.  He stands firmly on God’s promise to Abraham to bless all the nations through him (Genesis 12:1-3).  But if this was Israel’s purpose then the exile created some pretty weighty questions.  How could they still fulfill this role?  How could God bless the nations through Abraham’s descendants when those descendants themselves didn’t know him?  As Christopher Wright observes, “This question lies behind one of Ezekiel’s most characteristic expressions…’Then you will know that I am Yahweh’…”

Even more weighty than this question is the question of God’s glory.  The exile seemed to spit on the honor and reputation of the God of Israel.  When Babylon besieged Jerusalem and carried off captives in 597, and especially after the fall of Jerusalem a decade later, it looked like the gods of Babylon had defeated the God of Israel.  His name apparently had been disgraced.  But as we’ll see in this book, God wasn’t defeated.  In fact, he was the reason his people were exiled.  The honor of God’s name is a theme that gets taken up frequently in Ezekiel as a response to the crisis of faith many of the Israelites were having (for example, see Ezekiel 20:9,14,22; 38:23; 39:7, 21-23).  God cares about his glory, and he glorifies himself in the welfare of his people- a truth that is immensely comforting for believers today.  To glorify himself by making himself known among the nations, God must first restore his people who are to be the means of such world-wide salvation.  D.A. Williams says it very well:

“Ezekiel is true to the broad thrust of the Old Testament in developing a concern for the foreign nations that depends upon a covenantally obedient Israel…[He] can only offer hope to the nations through the restoration of Israel, a restoration that itself seems almost impossible.  Ezekiel stresses the importance of Yahweh’s reputation in the sight of the nations, and then points towards the restoration of Israel as the means by which Yahweh’s reputation in the eyes of the world will be restored…Ezekiel echoes the broad sweep of the Old Testament in pointing towards the restoration of Israel as Yahweh’s means of honouring his name amongst the nations.”

In short: God needs to fix the owies on Israel’s heart so that he can in turn fix the owies on the world’s heart. Bam. That last sentence just summed up the entire book for you.

1 Comment

Introduction to Ezekiel: The Historical Context

In the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, on the fifth day of the month, as I was among the exiles by the Chebar canal, the heavens were opened, and I saw vision of God.  On the fifth day of the month (it was the fifth year of the exile of King Jehoiachin), the word of the LORD came to Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the Chebar canal, and the hand of the LORD was upon him there.
-Ezekiel 1:1-3

The book of Ezekiel opens with two time references which provide a ton a contextual clues.  The first reference, “the thirtieth year”, is believed by many to refer to Ezekiel’s age.  The second (“the fifth day of the month” and “the fifth year of the exile of King Jehoiachin”) provides us with enough info to say that this thirtieth year is referring to either 593 or 592 BC.  If Ezekiel is indeed referring to his thirtieth birthday, that would place his birthday somewhere in 623 or 622, which was a significant time for the southern kingdom of Judah.  622 was the year that the book of the law was discovered in the temple.  King Josiah, who had been ruling for eighteen years at that point, had begun religious reforms five years earlier, and the discovery of the law intensified those reforms (see 2 Kings 22 and 2 Chronicles 34:1-21).

It was an exciting time for Judah.  For over a century (735 BC) they had been a vassal state of the Assyrian empire.  During Isaiah’s time, King Ahaz had made an alliance with Assyria in order to protect Judah from an alliance between the northern Kindgom of Israel and Syria.  By King Josiah’s time, the Assyrian empire was beginning to show cracks, and many of the empire’s western states were getting restless and beginning to desire independence.  So while there was legitimate, heartfelt desire on Josiah’s part for religious reform, nationalistic reform was also sweeping throughout the land as Judah sought freedom from Assyria.

King Josiah was killed in action at Megiddo in 609 when his army intercepted the Egyptian armies of Pharaoh Neco, who were on their way to help Assyria against the rising threat of Babylon.  Josiah’s son Jehoahaz took his father’s place on the throne and reigned a whopping three months before Neco deposed him and exiled him to Egypt.  In his place Neco installed another son of Josiah, Jehoiakim, thus ushering in a brief period of time in which Judah was under Egyptian control.  Jehoiakim fully complied with Egypt and reversed Josiah’s earlier reforms, and he was frequently the prophetic punching bag of Jeremiah.  In 605 he burned a scroll of Jeremiah’s prophecies (Jeremiah 36).  Ezekiel would have been a teenager at this point, and his writings indicate that he was familiar with Jeremiah’s prophecies.

In the same year, 605 BC, Egypt and Babylon, who were both in a power grab over the collapsing Assyrian empire, met in battle.  Under Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonians defeated Egypt.  Nebuchadnezzar seized control of Judah and other smaller states and took some of the nobles of Judah into captivity in Babylon (Daniel 1:1) and made Judah a vassal state.  Jehoiakim rebelled in 598-597, prompting a seige of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar. (2 Kings 24:1-2)  Sometime during the seige, Jehoiakim mysteriously died, and his son Jehoiachin ascended to his father’s throne only to surrender the city to Babylon three months later.  Nebuchadnezzar didn’t destroy Jerusalem, though he did cart off to Babylon the temple treasures, Jehoiachin himself, the royal family, and many important people. (2 Kings 24:8-17)  The Babylonians installed Jehoiachin’s uncle Matthaniah as a puppet king and changed his name to Zedekiah.  Though Nebuchadnezzar had already deported some Jews like Daniel in 605, 597 is generally referred to as the first deportation.  Among this group was a 25-year-old priest-in-training named Ezekiel.

The prophet Jeremiah’s ministry continued through the reign of Zedekiah.  During Zedekiah’s reign anti-Babylonian sentiment grew strong, and despite the prophet’s warnings, the king (who had been instilled by Nebuchadnezzar himself) started another rebellion against Babylon.  Finally fed up, Nebuchadnezzar launched a massive seige against the city which lasted eighteen long months.  Eventually the walls were breached, the army was killed, and much of the city, including God’s temple, was burned to the ground.  Zedekiah’s sons were executed in front of him, and then he was blinded.  He and most of the population of the city were carried off in disgrace to Mesopotamia to join the exiles who had already been there for ten years. (2 Kings 25:1-12)  As Christopher Wright says, “[t]he year was 587, the beginning of the most traumatic event in Israel’s whole biblical history.”

By the time Jerusalem fell, Ezekiel had been ministering to his fellow exiles in Babylon for five years.  He’d been ministering to people who never, ever believed that Jerusalem could finally fall.  When it did, with many new exiles to show for it, Ezekiel then spent the next fifteen years ministering to people who were completely and utterly demoralized, shattered, and hopeless.

Leave a Comment

The B-Sides of Scripture

At some point in the fall of 2009, I picked up a commentary on the book of Isaiah and began reading it from page 1.  Over the inconsistent course of about a year and a half, I walked through that massive Old Testament book chapter by chapter, reading it, meditating on it, studying the commentary on it, and writing out personal chapter summaries on it.  I officially completed that project earlier this year, and as it was a great benefit to me, I knew that I wanted to give the same kind of treatment to another book of the Bible (albeit at a quicker and more steady pace).  The winning book this time around is Ezekiel.

If you’ve read any of my most recent entries, you’ve probably seen me talk a lot about how beneficial it’s been in my own life to revisit and truly sit in Biblical truths than I’ve known my whole life.  The truths were always in front of me, but I never really sat down and asked myself “Do I believe this?”  That result of that process has been transforming to say the least.  I’ve been starting to go through a similar process with my knowledge of the Bible.  I’ve gotten a lot more honest with myself and others lately about things in scripture that I’m confused by, ignorant of, or straight up baffled by.  It’s easy to skim by difficult passages, vow to look them up later, and then forget about them.  Verses that confuse me fall under the cracks because they’re very familiar to me, and because they’re familiar I have a deep-seated assumption that I know what they mean.  For example: what does Jesus really mean when he said that faith the size of a mustard seed will move mountains?  (Matthew 17:20)  And what is Jesus referring to when he gives “the keys of the kingdom of heaven” to Peter so that he might bind and loose things on earth? (Matthew 16:19)  I like to learn about doctrines so much (baptism, communion, predestination, atonement, etc.) that I never seem to take the time to understand passages that don’t seem relevant to furthering my understanding of them.  And if I’m honest, sometimes learning doctrine is more about knowing how to win a debate versus knowing God and his Word.

So here’s the point of this entry: I want to know God’s Word better and through that to know him better.  To that end, I want to make it a regular occurrence on this blog to explore those passages and/or verses that perplex me.  (And feel free to ask about verses that have stumped you.  Perhaps I can help you to understand it or we can learn together.)  Furthermore, as I said I’ll be giving the book of Ezekiel the same kind of treatment that I gave to Isaiah, and I’ll be doing it on this blog.  Aside from isolated verses, the prophets of the Bible are a neglected bunch by me.  My journey through the book of Ezekiel will be a journey to understand it, appreciate it, and to clearly articulate its message.  Before jumping into the book’s first chapter, several shorter entries will be posted that give the background to the book.  When I get to the text itself (probably in a week and a half), generally one entry will cover one chapter of Ezekiel, and I think my goal will be to cover two chapters a week.

I’m fired up about this.  This is something I’ve been wanting to do on here for a long time.  I’ve got a passion for knowing and understanding the Bible more and for clearly communicating it to others, so my prayer is to do that here and to have fun with it.  Hope you’ll join in!

1 Comment

Jesus and Addiction: Is He Really Enough?

“Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning…”
-1 John 3:8a

Growing up in the church is probably exactly like growing up in a five-story mansion on the side of a snow-laden mountain overlooking a rainbow valley where you daily see flocks of unicorns grazing: it’s a beautiful thing, but you run the risk of over-exposure.  For a while you appreciate it, then one day you wake up finding yourself unable to be moved by what’s before you.  Even though my official “rebellion years” ended when I got to college, since then I’ve continued to run the risk of being overly exposed (and therefore hardened) by the beautiful truths that are constantly before me.  Thanks be to God though, because I’m slowly relearning the beautiful truths behind Bible verses and Christian jargon that for a long time had been cold to my soul.  In that relearning process though, I’ve found myself particularly cautious about Christian phrases that get thrown around as often as the plot to Zookeeper.  This entry is about one such phrase:

“Christ is Enough”

This phrase (or the trinitarianly-appropriate equivalent “God is enough”) was my banner for a long time through college.  Chris Tomlin’s ”More than Enough” was my theme song.  I started reading books like John Piper’s Desiring God and Brother Lawrence’s The Practice of the Presence of God to fuel my growing conviction that finding everything I needed in Jesus would increase my joy and destroy my sin addictions.  It wasn’t quite that simple though.

Here’s the problem with phrases like “Christ is enough” and other Christian jargon: it’s very much a summary of something that’s true.  To be sure, this is a true phrase.  But as a summary phrase, it skims over the process of how you get from point A to point B.  Saying “Christ is enough” is often used in books and sermons to curb idolatry and addictions.  Struggle with materialism?  Christ is enough.  Can’t stop looking at porn?  He satisfies.  Have a problem with overeating?  God is all you need.  Again, I believe that finding satisfaction in Christ is the answer for our addictions.  But simply telling someone that God is all they need without showing them how to find that satisfaction can be (at least in my own personal experience) very unhelpful.  Why?  An example:

I’ve often seen the whole “God is enough” thing illustrated in sermons by setting up two tables.  On one table is a burger, fries, and drink from McDonalds.  The other table has a literal feast on it.  The puny McDonalds combo is that sin you keep turning back to.  The sumptuous feast is what Christ offers.  It would be ridiculous to run to the McDonalds table for something  that is far less in comparison.  Similarly, it is ridiculous for you to indulge in your addiction when Christ is so much better.  So leave your addiction in order to gain something that will truly satisfy you.

I last saw this example in the midst of a huge struggle I was having with pornography.  As time passed I developed a growing dislike for that illustration, and it’s only been recently that I discovered why I think that it is an incomplete picture of the truth it aims to display.  See, whichever table you choose, whether it’s the dinky McDonalds meal or the super-satisfying feast, you’re still satisfying the same basic urge: hunger.  But that correlation doesn’t always make a visible translation from Feast/McDonalds to Christ/Addiction when you personalize it.  For example, the “McDonalds” bag for me at the time was porn, with Jesus at the feast table.   The application was that I should stop turning to porn and go to Jesus.  But here’s  the problem with the illustration: if I’m hungry (desire), either table will give me what I want, which is food (satisfaction).  The difference is only in the degree to which I satisfy my desire.  In the real world, if I really want to look at naked people (desire), I can go to the “fast food” table of porn in order to meet that desire (satisfaction), or I can go to the “feast” table of Jesus in order to…what exactly?  Jesus doesn’t sexually satisfy anyone.  In the illustration, the difference between the tables was one of varying degrees.  In the real world example, the tables don’t even appear to address the same longing.  If what you’re really wanting is to see nakedness, Jesus isn’t anywhere close to being enough for you.  He doesn’t even appear to be in the same category.  To the addict, his choice isn’t the difference between okay food and amazing food.  It’s between getting what he craves or not, making the illustration about as effective as pointing to his addiction and saying “Stop it.”

The only strength in the illustration is the truth it’s trying to present.  Jesus is better than porn and far more satisfying than it.  The illustration just doesn’t do a good job of teaching people why.  The common denominator between the tables was food.  But until you can establish a common denominator between porn and Jesus (that is, finding what it is that both porn and Jesus are trying to satisfy in you), the illustration won’t make sense nor will it free you from your addiction.  On the surface (and in the eyes of the addict), porn appears to be about satisfying basic bodily needs, whereas Jesus appears to be about wanting to save your soul so that you can spend eternity with him.  So how is the cross of Christ possibly relevant to our sinful struggles and addictions?  How do we make the connection between the tables?

The connection between our addictions and Jesus is so much harder to see in real life than it is in the food illustration.  To find it requires that we look deep into our hearts.  Proverbs 4:23 informs us that it’s from the heart that the springs of life flow, and that’s where the connection needs to be made.  To overcome any addiction with the truth that “Christ satisfies” or that “God is enough”, you must learn that he provides what you’ve turned to X,Y, or Z to get, only to a far greater degree.  For example, I have a friend who struggles with smoking.  What does “Christ is enough” look like for him?  Can Jesus satisfy him in such a way as to curb his appetite for cigarettes?  Certainly, but not because Jesus transubstantiates into the smoke which fills his lungs and becomes the equivalent of the most intense cigarette ever.  Rather, my friend struggles a lot with smoking when he feels bad about himself.  When negative thoughts start plaguing him, the temptation to smoke rises.  And there’s the connection.  His real urge isn’t to have a smoke.  It’s to know that he has worth, that he’s valuable.  Jesus is enough because he can remind him that he’s been chosen for salvation from before creation (Ephesians 1:4), that he’s blessed (Psalm 32:1-2), and that he is part of a royal priesthood (1 Peter 2:9-10).  Another friend of mine (whose insight I can echo) said that porn for him provides a sense of acceptance, because none of the women in porn reject him.  Porn for him then isn’t about looking at naked women.  It’s about gaining a sense of acceptance that he feels he lacks.  Christ is enough for him, not because he provides an orgasmic experience beyond anything porn could offer, but because Jesus’s sacrifice on the cross for him gives him all the acceptance one could ever hope to achieve: acceptance before the one person in this universe whose opinion really matters. (See Romans 5:1, 8:1)

What drives our addictions are misplaced needs, and oftentimes those needs aren’t obvious to us.  It’s easy to see the problem as porn or over-eating or smoking or alcohol.  But underneath all these are some very basic heart needs which aren’t being met, causing us to look to something, anything, to meet them.  To say it another way, we’re searching for ways to meet needs that only God can meet.  When we do this we commit idolatry, first in the heart and then in our actions.  Things like alcohol and porn are only the surface idols that are fueled by the idols of the heart.  In his book Redemption: Freed By Jesus From the Idols We Worship and the Wounds We Carry, author and pastor Mike Wilkerson recounts the story of three people: Philip, who struggled with pornography; Lisa, who struggled with an eating disorder; and Christine, who struggled with drug addiction and a promiscuous lifestyle.  What these three different people with their three different addictions had in common was the urge which led them to pursue their respective sins: “they craved the love, acceptance, and attention of people in their lives.”  He continues: “The variety of surface idols that expressed this single deep idol is surprisingly  broad: pornography, food, cutting, drugs, prostitution, theft, social striving, weight loss, and religion.  An idol always lives in the heart before it is made visible by the hands.”  In other words, one simple idol like craving the acceptance of others can lead to a myriad of different struggles.  That heart idol is what Jesus is more than enough for.

You won’t understand why Jesus is a better alternative until you understand what’s really feeding your addictions.  So what’s your addiction?  What’s your struggle?  What’s your version of the fast-food on the table?  Trace it back to the heart, for it’s only there that it can be cut off.  That’s where addictions start and where Christ comes in.  Jesus is better than the idols of your heart.  When you turn to Jesus to satisfy the longings of your heart that you’ve turned to [name it] to satisfy, the healing process will start.  I know this because I’ve experienced it.  By God’s grace I can call porn a “former” addiction, and it has very little to do with external measures like setting up accountability software (things which control behavior but not the heart).  It has everything to do with undermining the lies I was believing in my heart with the truth of my identity in Christ.  When all is said and done, Christ really is enough.

“…The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil.”
-1 John 3:8b

7 Comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 190 other followers